The
issue I raised will remain intact even after the solution suggested by Dr Wasti is adopted as the basic problem is not in the law but in its application. The
problem is more than legal.
Again
it is no argument to undermine a particular legislation just because the same
was promulgated by a military ruler. It is also not just to refer the Qisas and
Diyat laws to Gen. Zia ul Haq as the same were promulgated in 1990 during the
PPP era, long time after the death of late Gen. Zia. There may be problems in
any legislation whether promulgated by military ruler or anyone else. But it is
not justified to say, without impartial analysis, that a particular legislation is bad just because it is enacted by a military ruler.
As for as its transformation to the modern state theory is concerned, there is no
problem in regard to the current Qisas and Diyat laws and they can be well adjusted
in any kind of modern set up.
It is also pertinent to explain the meaning of Syasah here. It simply means the administration of justice according to Shariah. It never
gives the ruler any authority to deviate from the principles of Shariah as mentioned
by Jörg
Fisch in Cheap Lives and Dear Limbs: The British Transformation of
the Bengal Criminal Law, 1769-1817. The
basic objective of the Syasah jurisdiction is to fill the gaps left over to the
state by Shariah and achieve the high purposes of Islamic law rather than
deviate any of them.
Thus any change in the law, without giving any
attention to the other factors, will be more like to deceive one`s self. The main problems of the judicial delay,
corruption, nepotism, and politicisation which result in reducing the level of
social confidence in the overall judicial system will continue to exist. The
point I want to make here is that all other factors that affect the
administration of justice in Pakistan should be taken into account while formulating any policy regarding criminal justice. Merely changing the substantive provisions would not be of much help. The soul never thinks without a picture (Aristotle).
No comments:
Post a Comment